Hi Ole
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017, at 11:46, Ole Streicher wrote:
> On 17.10.2017 20:22, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> > As upstream maintainer, I admit to being a bit confused: we agreed to
> > move maintenance to the Debian Science Team, but then watched as skimage
> > was dropped from testing. If the
Hi Stefan,
On 17.10.2017 20:22, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> As upstream maintainer, I admit to being a bit confused: we agreed to
> move maintenance to the Debian Science Team, but then watched as skimage
> was dropped from testing. If the team does not take responsibility for
> keeping the pack
Hi Ole
As upstream maintainer, I admit to being a bit confused: we agreed to
move maintenance to the Debian Science Team, but then watched as skimage
was dropped from testing. If the team does not take responsibility for
keeping the package up to date, who is ultimately responsible?
Thank you ve
Source: skimage
Version: 0.13.1-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, deb...@onerussian.com
Hi Yaroslav,
skimage was under Debian Science Team maintenance since the bugfixes
just before the freeze of Stretch, and I think the move was done with
your agreement. This w
4 matches
Mail list logo