Hi Ole On Tue, Oct 17, 2017, at 11:46, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 17.10.2017 20:22, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > As upstream maintainer, I admit to being a bit confused: we agreed to > > move maintenance to the Debian Science Team, but then watched as skimage > > was dropped from testing. If the team does not take responsibility for > > keeping the package up to date, who is ultimately responsible? > > In my opinion: The "Uploader" still has most responsibility, but others > also can step in and help with a low threshold if problems appear. > Either by submitting to git, or with directly uploading an update.
Thanks for helping me understand this. So, in the case of skimage being removed from testing, who should have handled the issue, ideally? Stéfan
