Control: tag -1 confirmed
Adam D. Barratt (2014-12-15):
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Re-confirming. ;)
> On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 07:27 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > systemd 215-8 has now been in unstable for 9 days without any
> > regression reports. It fixes the three current RC bugs in te
On 2014-12-19 6:08, Martin Pitt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +]:
Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack.
It still didn't propagate, I guess the d-i ack didn't happen yet?
Indeed. There'd generally be a follow-up to the bug if it had.
-8 does not change any udev code or
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +]:
> Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack.
It still didn't propagate, I guess the d-i ack didn't happen yet? -8
does not change any udev code or the udebs, so d-i should be rather
unaffected?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| htt
Hey Adam,
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +]:
> There's something slightly odd about introducing a file that says "This
> file is not intended to be distributed". :-)
Oops, that looks like an overzealous copy & paste error.
> Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack.
Cheers!
> See also
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 07:27 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> systemd 215-8 has now been in unstable for 9 days without any
> regression reports. It fixes the three current RC bugs in testing, so
> I think it's time to let this in.
There's something slightly odd about i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
systemd 215-8 has now been in unstable for 9 days without any
regression reports. It fixes the three current RC bugs in testing, so
I think it's time to let this in.
I attach the full debdi
6 matches
Mail list logo
