On 2014-12-19 6:08, Martin Pitt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +0000]:
Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack.
It still didn't propagate, I guess the d-i ack didn't happen yet?
Indeed. There'd generally be a follow-up to the bug if it had.
-8 does not change any udev code or the udebs, so d-i should be rather
unaffected?
Nevertheless we were asked to get acks for all udeb-producing packages.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
