Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 07:27 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> systemd 215-8 has now been in unstable for 9 days without any
> regression reports. It fixes the three current RC bugs in testing, so
> I think it's time to let this in.
There's something slightly odd about introducing a file that says "This
file is not intended to be distributed". :-)
Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack. See also #773183 if you
haven't already.
A couple of minor points:
++ /* we only create the alias symlink for non sysvinit services */
++ if (access(target_unit_path, F_OK) < 0 && (errno == ENOENT)) {
++ log_warning("%s doesn't seem to be a system unit, we disable
the systemd enabled display manager", target_unit_path);
Should that be "systemd unit"?
++ target_unit_path = "/dev/null";
++ } else {
++ log_warning("%s point at %s while the default systemd unit is
%s. Reconfiguring %s as default.",
s/point/points/
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
