Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2022-11-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 bookworm sid 8 years later, does anyone think that libarch-perl (and tla itself) would still be useful? Even git-arch is no longer shipped in the past two Debian releases. cu Adrian On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:43AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On W

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2014-02-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:50:35AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Hi Adrian, Hi Axel, > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > first of all, please Cc the submitter when answering to him > > My answer was not to specific to the submitter but to the bug report > and the discussion in general so that others have

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2014-02-04 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk wrote: > first of all, please Cc the submitter when answering to him My answer was not to specific to the submitter but to the bug report and the discussion in general so that others have data to make up their own opinion. (Otherwise I likely would have written "Hi Adrian"

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2014-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:53:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=tla > The latest open bug from someone actually using it seems to be #419817 > from 2007. >... /me is blind. #522082 from 2009 cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2014-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi Axel, first of all, please Cc the submitter when answering to him - the BTS does *not* send a copy to the submitter except when you add either his email address or -submit...@bugs.debian.org to the Cc. http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=git-arch git suggests git-arch, and git-all

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2013-12-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi again, Axel Beckert wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: libarch-perl [...] > > GNU arch is dead since 2006, and I seriously doubt that anyone is still > > using libarch-perl. > > Popcon is steadily descreasing in the past 5 years, but there are a > few "votes", so there are definitely peo

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2013-12-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: libarch-perl > Version: 0.5.2-1 > Severity: normal > > GNU arch is dead since 2006, and I seriously doubt that anyone is still > using libarch-perl. Popcon is steadily descreasing in the past 5 years, but there are a few "votes", so there are definitely people u

Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

2013-12-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: libarch-perl Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: normal GNU arch is dead since 2006, and I seriously doubt that anyone is still using libarch-perl. Please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org for requesting the removal of libarch-perl from Debian. Feel free to close this bug if you disagree. --