Hi, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: libarch-perl > Version: 0.5.2-1 > Severity: normal > > GNU arch is dead since 2006, and I seriously doubt that anyone is still > using libarch-perl.
Popcon is steadily descreasing in the past 5 years, but there are a few "votes", so there are definitely people using the package actively: http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libarch-perl The reasoning seems nevertheless comprehensible -- at least from the point of someone who never used tla. I though have to point out that there are no other open bug reports against libarch-perl and there were no bug reports in the past year either: http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/liba/libarch-perl.png So I think it should probably stay until tla itself is about to be removed as it does no harm if it stays. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
