Bug#699682: Processed: not relevant for wheezy

2013-02-03 Thread Markus Koschany
On 03.02.2013 22:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:29 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> No. wheezy-ignore is a tag for the use of the Release Team and should >>> not be set without their agreement; see the bold sections in >>> http:

Bug#699682: Processed: not relevant for wheezy

2013-02-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:29 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > No. wheezy-ignore is a tag for the use of the Release Team and should > > not be set without their agreement; see the bold sections in > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags > > > > I

Bug#699682: Processed: not relevant for wheezy

2013-02-03 Thread Markus Koschany
On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tags 699682 - wheezy-ignore > > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 21:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: >> >>> tags 699682 wheezy-ignore >> Bug #699682 [atomix,atomix-data] atomix-data: fails to upgrade

Bug#699682: Processed: not relevant for wheezy

2013-02-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tags 699682 - wheezy-ignore On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 21:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > tags 699682 wheezy-ignore > Bug #699682 [atomix,atomix-data] atomix-data: fails to upgrade from 'testing' > - trying to overwrite /usr/share/p