On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:29 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > No. wheezy-ignore is a tag for the use of the Release Team and should > > not be set without their agreement; see the bold sections in > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags > > > > In this case it's also pointless. The BTS knows the bug only affects > > unstable so there would be no need for us to ignore it in any case. > > Sorry for the confusion. I didn't know the BTS knows that the bug only > affects unstable. Thanks for the clarification.
Even if the BTS didn't know that, you shouldn't be setting the wheezy-ignore tag without release team authorization; that was my main point. I'll trust you'll remember this in future. :-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
