On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tags 699682 - wheezy-ignore > > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 21:03 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: >> >>> tags 699682 wheezy-ignore >> Bug #699682 [atomix,atomix-data] atomix-data: fails to upgrade from >> 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/pixmaps/atomix-icon.xpm > > No. wheezy-ignore is a tag for the use of the Release Team and should > not be set without their agreement; see the bold sections in > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags > > In this case it's also pointless. The BTS knows the bug only affects > unstable so there would be no need for us to ignore it in any case.
Sorry for the confusion. I didn't know the BTS knows that the bug only affects unstable. Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
