> Well, meson is a build system, there could be legitimate reasons for
> the build-dependency (determining compiler flags, etc.).
The reason Meson build-depends on objc is that as part of its test
suite it compiles a test project for all languages that it supports.
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Looks like meson and uwsgi build depend on gnustep but don't link to
> it. So most likely they don't need it and the build dependency could
> be dropped.
Well, meson is a build system, there could be legitimate reasons for
the build-dependency (determining compiler
On 08/07/14 10:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 08/07/14 09:58, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Everything else looks good, so please go ahead.
>>
>> Thanks; gnustep-base and -gui are now built and installed on all
>> architectures. Please schedule the binNMUs at yo
On 08/07/14 09:58, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Everything else looks good, so please go ahead.
>
> Thanks; gnustep-base and -gui are now built and installed on all
> architectures. Please schedule the binNMUs at your earliest
> convenience.
I have scheduled the first
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Everything else looks good, so please go ahead.
Thanks; gnustep-base and -gui are now built and installed on all
architectures. Please schedule the binNMUs at your earliest
convenience.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 07/07/14 09:47, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> I'm waiting for gnustep-back to get ACCEPTed and built everywhere.
>> Once done, we're basically ready (I only have to backport my
>> gnustep-base patch for the gnutls transition).
>
> ACCEPTed and built
Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I'm waiting for gnustep-back to get ACCEPTed and built everywhere.
> Once done, we're basically ready (I only have to backport my
> gnustep-base patch for the gnutls transition).
ACCEPTed and built on almost all release architectures (mipsen
slightly lagging behind). Please
At Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:41:07 +0200,
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 03-07-14 18:44, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> >>> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
> >>
> >> I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever
> >> uploaded? How are things looking here?
Release
On 03-07-14 18:44, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>>> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
>>
>> I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever
>> uploaded? How are things looking here?
>
> No, unfortunately nobody volunteered to sponsor them [2] yet... My
>
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/05/14 03:29, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24
> > libgnustep-gui0.20 -> 0.24
>
> I have updated the tracker for that.
Thanks.
> As for libobj3 -> libobj4, there's just openvpn-auth-ldap remaining,
> which is #747989.
I'll take a look.
On 28/05/14 03:29, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Yavor, is there any plan to do the transition? #673538 didn't look
>> like it was blocking on us.
>
> Please accept my apologies for being MIA for so long.
>
> I have the new GNUstep core pa
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:29:59 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
>
Sounds great, thanks!
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Yavor, is there any plan to do the transition? #673538 didn't look
> like it was blocking on us.
Please accept my apologies for being MIA for so long.
I have the new GNUstep core packages ready at mentors.d.n (targeted
for experiment
Am 02.06.2013 10:35, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 16:07:03 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
>> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
>>
>> We'd like to carry out a GNUstep transition prior to the forthco
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 16:07:03 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> We'd like to carry out a GNUstep transition prior to the forthcoming release:
>
> libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24
>
On 27/06/2012 17:40, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 26/06/2012 20:27, Yavor Doganov wrote:
gnustep-dl2: DBModeler aborts on startup with
NSInvalidArgumentException textedit.app: Cannot create new
documents or open existing text files
and are they fixable?
As I'm not familiar
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 26/06/2012 20:27, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > gnustep-dl2: DBModeler aborts on startup with NSInvalidArgumentException
> > textedit.app: Cannot create new documents or open existing text files
>
> and are they fixable?
As I'm not familiar with the code, I'll have to inves
On 26/06/2012 20:27, Yavor Doganov wrote:
gnustep-dl2: DBModeler aborts on startup with NSInvalidArgumentException
textedit.app: Cannot create new documents or open existing text files
and are they fixable?
Besides, do we have a fix for #663388?
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 20/06/2012 13:20, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > No, but I'm going to do it now.
>
> Any news?
Yes, with gnustep-base built with the patch I have prepared I found
only two grave issues so far:
gnustep-dl2: DBModeler aborts on startup with NSInvalidArgumentException
textedit.
On 20/06/2012 13:20, Yavor Doganov wrote:
No, but I'm going to do it now.
Any news?
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Do you have an idea on which fixes are needed to be backported if we
> don't have time to do a transition?
Yes.
> Did you test them?
No, but I'm going to do it now. The changes are minimal but are in a
hairy area and that makes me feel uneasy. This combination has never
b
Hi,
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
On 05/19/2012 04:33 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Either way, the current state is broken, because -base is linked
> with libobjc3 while -gui is mixed because it failed to built at that
> time, so many GNUstep packages are unusable because they end up
>
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:33:05PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I'll let you know of all the issues once we have the core packages
> ready.
It's looking good, I think -- gnustep-base/1.24, gnustep-gui/0.22 and
gnustep-back/0.22 are in experimental. Summary of the bugs/issues:
gcc-4.7/libobjc4 [
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> What happens if the gcc-defaults switch is finally reverted?
You'd have to schedule binNMUs on all archs where 4.7 is the default.
The same if 4.7 becomes the default compiler on more architectures, as
Matthias Klose indicated on our list.
Either way, the current state is
Hi Yavor,
and thanks for checking with us.
Yavor Doganov (19/05/2012):
> We'd like to carry out a GNUstep transition prior to the forthcoming
> release:
>
> libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24
> libgnustep-gui0.20 -> 0.22
> libobjc3 -> 4 (on architectures where gcc-4.7 is the default)
>
> I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We'd like to carry out a GNUstep transition prior to the forthcoming release:
libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24
libgnustep-gui0.20 -> 0.22
libobjc3-> 4 (on architectures where gcc
26 matches
Mail list logo
