On 28/05/14 03:29, Yavor Doganov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >> Yavor, is there any plan to do the transition? #673538 didn't look >> like it was blocking on us. > > Please accept my apologies for being MIA for so long. > > I have the new GNUstep core packages ready at mentors.d.n (targeted > for experimental, of course). There were new upstream releases in the > meantime, so we'll omit -gui0.22 entirely. IOW: > > libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24 > libgnustep-gui0.20 -> 0.24
I have updated the tracker for that. As for libobj3 -> libobj4, there's just openvpn-auth-ldap remaining, which is #747989. That shouldn't block this transition though AFAICS. What can block it is gnustep-base failing on s390x (it may be failing on other architectures as well, as the others were built 2 years ago and have never been retried): https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnustep-base&suite=experimental > I rebuilt all GNUstep packages in the archive and fortunately there > are only two FTBFS bugs -- #749553 (cenon.app) and #749554 (sogo). I see one is fixed and the other one has a patch. > gnustep-dl2 also fails to build, but that's due to the > texi2html->makeinfo switch in gnustep-make and is trivial to fix (I'll > report the bug tomorrow). In the next few days I'll examine the build > logs for compiler warnings and will report those issues that may lead > to problems at runtime. > > I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK? I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever uploaded? How are things looking here? Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
