Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2013-05-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 17:26:47 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 08.05.2013 16:50, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:39:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >> There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least > >> Ubuntu didn't

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2013-05-08 Thread Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08.05.2013 16:50, schrieb Julien Cristau: > Hi Matthias, > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:39:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least >> Ubuntu didn't see any). >> >> A large numb

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2013-05-08 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Matthias, On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:39:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at > least Ubuntu didn't see any). > > A large number of binNMUs could be avoided if Haskell wouldn't hard > code libffi dependencies in every haskell pack

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2012-06-15 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
tags 667906 - sid wheezy tags 667906 + wheezy-ignore thanks On 13/06/2012 00:36, Matthias Klose wrote: On 11.06.2012 00:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 22:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Are there likely to be any issues if the transition migrated in stages - i.e. if the new

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2012-06-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11.06.2012 00:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 22:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Are there likely to be any issues if the transition migrated in stages - >> i.e. if the new libffi including libffi6 and the old libffi5 binary >> (kept around by britney) co-exist in testing

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2012-06-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 22:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Are there likely to be any issues if the transition migrated in stages - > i.e. if the new libffi including libffi6 and the old libffi5 binary > (kept around by britney) co-exist in testing - and rebuilt binaries > migrate as and when they

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2012-06-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 13:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least > Ubuntu > didn't see any). > > A large number of binNMUs could be avoided if Haskell wouldn't hard code > libffi > dependencies in every haskell package (see #63

Bug#667906: transition: libffi

2012-04-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Tags: wheezy, sid Severity: normal There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least Ubuntu didn't see any). A large number of binNMUs could be avoided if Haskell wouldn't hard