-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 08.05.2013 16:50, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Sat, Apr  7, 2012 at 13:39:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
>> There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least
>> Ubuntu didn't see any).
>> 
>> A large number of binNMUs could be avoided if Haskell wouldn't hard code
>> libffi dependencies in every haskell package (see #639015).
>> 
> How does this interact with the current gcc changes?  It seems gcj-* have a
> build-dep on libffi, but no runtime dep?  We should try to coordinate with
> the haskell folks to make this not too painful...

this is independent. the internal libffi is used for the gcc/gcj builds.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGKbrcACgkQStlRaw+TLJzk/QCePUHfbBcJrcqOttHW+Fz2IIz8
t3oAmQGmOTf9DQ6oKiqypKxR6/K1E2+n
=s9KZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to