On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 17:26:47 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 08.05.2013 16:50, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:39:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >> There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least > >> Ubuntu didn't see any). > >> > >> A large number of binNMUs could be avoided if Haskell wouldn't hard code > >> libffi dependencies in every haskell package (see #639015). > >> > > How does this interact with the current gcc changes? It seems gcj-* have a > > build-dep on libffi, but no runtime dep? We should try to coordinate with > > the haskell folks to make this not too painful... > > this is independent. the internal libffi is used for the gcc/gcj builds. > OK, then I have no objection to proceeding with libffi6 at this point. I've asked the haskell people to hold off on their own transitions for now.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
