On 2011-10-12 21:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-10-10 11:53 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
>>> The problem is that we have two versions of the headers, one in
>>> libncurses5-dev and one in libncursesw5-dev, and there does not seem to
>>> be a shareable subset suitable for libtinfo-dev.
>>
On 2011-10-10 11:53 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> The problem is that we have two versions of the headers, one in
>> libncurses5-dev and one in libncursesw5-dev, and there does not seem to
>> be a shareable subset suitable for libtinfo-dev.
>> E.g. /usr/include/term.h #includes , and
>> /usr/inc
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-10-10 02:55 +0200, Craig Small wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:09:54PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
I wonder whether it would be a good idea to instead provide symlinks in
libtinfo-dev, i.e.
libtermcap.so -> libtinfo.so and libtermcap.a -> libt
On 2011-10-10 02:55 +0200, Craig Small wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:09:54PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I wonder whether it would be a good idea to instead provide symlinks in
>> libtinfo-dev, i.e.
>> libtermcap.so -> libtinfo.so and libtermcap.a -> libtinfo.a .
> I assume that the functi
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:06:43 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> In that case, it would be necessary to make libncurses5-dev depend
> on tinfo-dev (otherwise the headers would be duplicated).
That seems to be the case already:
$ apt-cache --no-all-versions show libncurses5-dev | grep Depends
Depends:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Craig Small wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:09:54PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
I wonder whether it would be a good idea to instead provide symlinks in
libtinfo-dev, i.e.
libtermcap.so -> libtinfo.so and libtermcap.a -> libtinfo.a .
I assume that the functions required in
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:09:54PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I wonder whether it would be a good idea to instead provide symlinks in
> libtinfo-dev, i.e.
> libtermcap.so -> libtinfo.so and libtermcap.a -> libtinfo.a .
I assume that the functions required in libtermcap are provided by
libtinfo.
On 2011-10-05 22:29 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> Package: libtinfo-dev
>> Version: 5.9-2
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> Currently libncurses5-dev provides symlinks
>> libtermcap.so -> libncurses.so and libtermcap.a -> libncurses.a .
>>
>> I wonder whether
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
Package: libtinfo-dev
Version: 5.9-2
Severity: wishlist
Currently libncurses5-dev provides symlinks
libtermcap.so -> libncurses.so and libtermcap.a -> libncurses.a .
I wonder whether it would be a good idea to instead provide symlinks in
libtinfo-dev, i.
Package: libtinfo-dev
Version: 5.9-2
Severity: wishlist
Currently libncurses5-dev provides symlinks
libtermcap.so -> libncurses.so and libtermcap.a -> libncurses.a .
I wonder whether it would be a good idea to instead provide symlinks in
libtinfo-dev, i.e.
libtermcap.so -> libtinfo.so and libterm
10 matches
Mail list logo
