Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Scott Howard
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:19:04PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Bill Allombert >> wrote: >> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:40:23PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: >> > >> > Why do you need multiarch support for ? >

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Jonas Meyer
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Jonas Meyer wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bill Allombert >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:40:32AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Bill Allombert wrote

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:19:04PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Bill Allombert > wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:40:23PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > > > > Why do you need multiarch support for ? > > eagle is compiled against libjpeg62 and the eagle binaries

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:53:05PM +0200, Jonas Meyer wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bill Allombert > wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:40:32AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Bill Allombert > >> wrote: > >> > So you do not need libjpeg62-dev to be m

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Jonas Meyer
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:40:32AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Bill Allombert >> wrote: >> > So you do not need libjpeg62-dev to be multi-arch, only libjpeg62 ? >> >> >> Yes, we just need libjpeg62:i386 and

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:40:32AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Bill Allombert > wrote: > > So you do not need libjpeg62-dev to be multi-arch, only libjpeg62 ? > > > Yes, we just need libjpeg62:i386 and libjpeg62:amd64 to be > coinstallable (multiarch paths), than

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Scott Howard
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Bill Allombert wrote: > So you do not need libjpeg62-dev to be multi-arch, only libjpeg62 ? Yes, we just need libjpeg62:i386 and libjpeg62:amd64 to be coinstallable (multiarch paths), thank you. Cheers, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-06-02 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:19:04PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Bill Allombert > wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:40:23PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > > > > Why do you need multiarch support for ? > > eagle is compiled against libjpeg62 and the eagle binaries

Bug#642079: Bug#672736: Bug#642079: Bug#672736: removal of eagle

2012-05-31 Thread Scott Howard
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:40:23PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > > Why do you need multiarch support for ? eagle is compiled against libjpeg62 and the eagle binaries are only available as i386 (closed-sourced, pre-compiled, but distributable