Bug#602132: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#602132: Bug#602132: openmpi-bin: Please enable threading support

2010-11-03 Thread Philipp Edelmann
Hi, I have been using a self-compiled version of OpenMPI 1.4 with threads enabled for some time now and I haven't had any issues so far (even with MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE). Also the Debian package with activated threading seems to work fine. The upstream opinion (according to the 1.4 docs at [1]) see

Bug#602132: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#602132: Bug#602132: openmpi-bin: Please enable threading support

2010-11-02 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 08:02 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Is the root cause for disabling it that it crashes on kFreeBSD, or that > is it deemed experimental by upstream? It was indeed deemed experimental upstream, so disabling it on certain arches will not help much. It might very well b

Bug#602132: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#602132: openmpi-bin: Please enable threading support

2010-11-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 01/11/10 at 22:51 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > thanks for your report! > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:18:14PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > In debian/rules, there's a mention that threading support is disabled > > because it is broken according to #435581. That bug is really o

Bug#602132: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#602132: openmpi-bin: Please enable threading support

2010-11-01 Thread Manuel Prinz
Hi Lucas, thanks for your report! On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:18:14PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > In debian/rules, there's a mention that threading support is disabled > because it is broken according to #435581. That bug is really old, and > I'm wondering whether we could revisit that decision

Bug#602132: openmpi-bin: Please enable threading support

2010-11-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: openmpi-bin Version: 1.4.2-4 Severity: normal Hi, In debian/rules, there's a mention that threading support is disabled because it is broken according to #435581. That bug is really old, and I'm wondering whether we could revisit that decision now (maybe upstream has an opinion on this?)