Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-25 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 21.05.2010 17:22, schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: Could you check every reverse package on ufraw and fill a bug asking to consider depend on ufraw-batch ? Done. $ apt-cache rdepends ufraw ufraw Reverse Depends: imagemagick geeqie geeqie-gps (#583083) fotoxx (#583084) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-21 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 21.05.2010 16:54, schrieb Hubert Chathi: >> >> I'll also split ufraw-batch into a separate package, to reduce the size >> of the default install. (Probably the majority of users don't do raw >> processing.) > > Great news, thank you ver

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-21 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Fri 21 May 2010 03:46:46 AM EDT, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 20.05.2010 16:58, schrieb Hubert Chathi: No. Having it in the menu is valuable for those who do RAW processing. [...] Plus, I believe that there is a consensus in GNOME that applications (e.g. file viewers like eog or evince)

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-21 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 21.05.2010 16:54, schrieb Hubert Chathi: I'll also split ufraw-batch into a separate package, to reduce the size of the default install. (Probably the majority of users don't do raw processing.) Great news, thank you very much. However, if you really split ufraw-batch into a separate packag

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-21 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 20.05.2010 16:58, schrieb Hubert Chathi: No. Having it in the menu is valuable for those who do RAW processing. Well, I'd agree if you said having the software installed would be valuable for those (I guess: few?) of us doing RAW processing. But those could still benefit from the MIME bind

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Hubert Chathi wrote: >> On Fri 30 Apr 2010 10:47:33 AM EDT, Fabian Greffrath >> wrote: >> >>> on a freshly installed Debian squeeze desktop system, ufraw appears in the >>> GNOME application menu (this i

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Hubert Chathi wrote: > On Fri 30 Apr 2010 10:47:33 AM EDT, Fabian Greffrath > wrote: > >> on a freshly installed Debian squeeze desktop system, ufraw appears in the >> GNOME application menu (this is because inkscape, which is installed by >> default, recommends i

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-05-20 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Fri 30 Apr 2010 10:47:33 AM EDT, Fabian Greffrath wrote: on a freshly installed Debian squeeze desktop system, ufraw appears in the GNOME application menu (this is because inkscape, which is installed by default, recommends imagemagick which in turn recommends ufraw). [...] Since the

Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

2010-04-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
reassign 579160 ufraw found 579160 0.16-1 tags 579160 = thanks Am 30.04.2010 16:36, schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: Please in any case could yo report before doing something in gnome this bug to ufraw package ? Dear ufraw maintainer, on a freshly installed Debian squeeze desktop system, ufraw appe