On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > Am 21.05.2010 16:54, schrieb Hubert Chathi: >> >> I'll also split ufraw-batch into a separate package, to reduce the size >> of the default install. (Probably the majority of users don't do raw >> processing.) > > Great news, thank you very much. However, if you really split ufraw-batch > into a separate package and other tools recommend this package for batch > processing (which I highly appreciate), you should maybe keep the ufraw icon > visible in the menu. The rationale is that you can expect the ufraw package > to be installed on user demand then, other packages would just have pulled > in ufraw-batch. > Could you check every reverse package on ufraw and fill a bug asking to consider depend on ufraw-batch ?
Tahnsk Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
