On Fri 21 May 2010 03:46:46 AM EDT, Fabian Greffrath
<fab...@greffrath.com> wrote:
Am 20.05.2010 16:58, schrieb Hubert Chathi:
No. Having it in the menu is valuable for those who do RAW processing.
[...]
Plus, I believe that there is a consensus in GNOME that applications
(e.g. file viewers like eog or evince) which are pretty useless
unless opened with a file (i.e. which do not offer a "File -> New"
menu) are hidden from the menu and only opened via file context.
OK, that sounds like a reasonable argument. TBH, I personally just
use the command line to launch ufraw. I will consider hiding ufraw
from the menu.
I'm not sure why ImageMagick is recommending a GUI tool. It would be
better for it to either use dcraw for its raw processing (which is a
command-line tool), or if they need to use ufraw-batch, then it may be
best to split up ufraw-batch from the ufraw package.
As Bastien pointed out, if you could please split the GUI from the
batch processing in this package and imagemagick changes recommends
only to the latter, then I'll be satisfied enough to close this bug.
;)
I'll also split ufraw-batch into a separate package, to reduce the
size of the default install. (Probably the majority of users don't do
raw processing.)
--
Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
