On 03/02/10 11:59, Piotr Pokora wrote:
Attaching new patch:
* version bump
* added myself to uploaders
Piotras
Uploaded!
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Attaching new patch:
* version bump
* added myself to uploaders
Piotras
Index: debian/control.in
===
--- debian/control.in (wersja 22890)
+++ debian/control.in (kopia robocza)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Mai
On 29/01/10 09:10, Piotr Pokora wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze:
On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote:
and removes uploader section.
Why?
I thought it was supposed to be not NMU, which means maintainer is an
uploader.
An MU means the one who uploads (i.e. the one listed in the debian
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze:
> On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote:
>> and removes uploader section.
>
> Why?
I thought it was supposed to be not NMU, which means maintainer is an
uploader.
Piotras
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote:
and removes uploader section.
Why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Josselin Mouette pisze:
Hi!
>> If needed I can prepare new patch which includes all your suggestions.
>
> It can be a good exercise :)
The one attached doesn't change much. Just fixes duplicated dependency
and removes uploader section.
> Please also test the package; if you have an application
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 18:09 +0100, Piotr Pokora a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette pisze:
>
> >> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22),
> >> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3),
> >
> > Same here. Why bump this dependency?
>
> Because libxml2-dev can not be less than 2.7.3 in debian unst
Josselin Mouette pisze:
>> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22),
>> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3),
>
> Same here. Why bump this dependency?
Because libxml2-dev can not be less than 2.7.3 in debian unstable. The
same applies to cdbs and libglib2.0-dev. It's absolutely safe from
upstre
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 17:04 +0100, Piotr Pokora a écrit :
> Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream
> release,
> which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself.
>
> Attaching debian files patch.
Thanks for your proposal for help. Unfortunately there are several
iss
Hi Piotr,
On 27/01/10 17:04, Piotr Pokora wrote:
Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream release,
which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself.
Attaching debian files patch.
Thanks for looking at libgda! I have some comments wrt your patch:
-Build-Depends: cdbs (>=
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze:
> Hi Piotr,
Hi!
>> -Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.41),
>> +Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.65),
>
>> - libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.16),
>> + libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.22),
>
>> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22),
>> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3),
>
> You didn't mention why you bumped these build
Package: libgda-4.0-4
Version: 4.0.4-1
Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream release,
which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself.
Attaching debian files patch.
Piotras
Index: debian/control
===
--- debi
12 matches
Mail list logo
