Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 18:09 +0100, Piotr Pokora a écrit : > Josselin Mouette pisze: > > >> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22), > >> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3), > > > > Same here. Why bump this dependency? > > Because libxml2-dev can not be less than 2.7.3 in debian unstable. The > same applies to cdbs and libglib2.0-dev. It's absolutely safe from > upstream point of view.
It’s not a question of being safe. Of course it is safe to require higher versions than the ones actually needed. However, you should not ask for more than what the package actually requires, since it is going to complicate the work of people making backports or using the packages for other purposes. For packages like glib which ship .symbols files, this will also needlessly bump the runtime dependency. > If needed I can prepare new patch which includes all your suggestions. It can be a good exercise :) Please also test the package; if you have an application that uses it heavily, it will better than the kind of testing we can give it. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée