Bug#960681: Bug#513967:l icensecheck: fails to detect license at end (option --tail is broken)

2021-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
; Sourced Technologies S.L.] The issue tracked here as bug#513967 is failure to continue scanning at bottom when *nothing* is detected at top. What you present here, Dominique, is not a bug but a feature: By default (and whenever option --lines is non-zero) licensecheck sloppily stops scanning

Bug#960681: Bug#513967:l icensecheck: fails to detect license at end (option --tail is broken)

2021-11-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Dominique Dumont (2021-11-21 18:32:31) > On Saturday, 20 November 2021 11:15:59 CET Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I would appreciate some numbers about actual slowdown. > > Fair enough. > > Here are some measurements where the cell content is the "real" time given by > time command. > > T

Bug#960681: Bug#513967:l icensecheck: fails to detect license at end (option --tail is broken)

2021-11-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 20 November 2021 11:15:59 CET Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I would appreciate some numbers about actual slowdown. Fair enough. Here are some measurements where the cell content is the "real" time given by time command. This table is to be viewed with a monospace font. licensecheck co

Bug#960681: Bug#513967:l icensecheck: fails to detect license at end (option --tail is broken)

2021-11-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Dominique, Quoting Dominique Dumont (2021-11-19 18:06:00) > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:26:53 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > It is (slower but) more reliable to use "--lines 0". > > Indeed. I have a similar case with #1000179 where licensecheck does not get > copyright assignment from a LICENS

Bug#960681: Bug#513967:l icensecheck: fails to detect license at end (option --tail is broken)

2021-11-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:26:53 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > It is (slower but) more reliable to use "--lines 0". Indeed. I have a similar case with #1000179 where licensecheck does not get copyright assignment from a LICENSE file: $ licensecheck --copyright LICENSE LICENSE: *No copyright* Apa

Bug#513967: licensecheck: fails to detect buried license by default

2020-05-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: block -1 by 960695 I believe the issue originally reported is addressed when licensecheck can "switch profile", including a one where default for option --lines is 0. Bug#960695 tracks the implementation of that general mechanism. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Interne

Bug#513967:

2018-04-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Excerpts from Vasyl Vavrychuk's message of april 12, 2018 11:01 pm: licensecheck seems not checking at the end by default because for https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lua/lua/master/lua.h I get licensecheck lua.h lua.h: UNKNOWN Oh. Looks like the --tail option is broken. :-/ I normally use

Bug#513967:

2018-04-12 Thread Vasyl Vavrychuk
licensecheck seems not checking at the end by default because for https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lua/lua/master/lua.h I get licensecheck lua.h lua.h: UNKNOWN Maybe described feature is needed for reporter of this bug. Also if we want to have fully automated way to licensecheck of all Debian pa

Bug#513967:

2018-04-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Excerpts from Vasyl Vavrychuk's message of april 12, 2018 9:54 am: How about licensecheck detects pattern "See Copyright Notice at the end of this file" and goes LICENSECHECK_PARSELINES from the end to look for a license. Heh - that's a clever idea. I worry it might be too clever, though: It

Bug#513967:

2018-04-12 Thread Vasyl Vavrychuk
How about licensecheck detects pattern "See Copyright Notice at the end of this file" and goes LICENSECHECK_PARSELINES from the end to look for a license.

Bug#513967: licensecheck fails to spot licence in ext/ directory of ocropus-0.2

2009-02-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 21:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 21:50 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > > Package: devscripts > > Severity: normal > > Version: 2.10.45 > > > > the title says it all ;) > > Well, not quite. :-) [...] > Since licensecheck doesn't claim to be able t

Bug#513967: licensecheck fails to spot licence in ext/ directory of ocropus-0.2

2009-02-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 513967 wishlist thanks On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 21:50 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > Package: devscripts > Severity: normal > Version: 2.10.45 > > the title says it all ;) Well, not quite. :-) For example, it doesn't tell us where we can find a copy of the files (neither apt-cache sear

Bug#513967: licensecheck fails to spot licence in ext/ directory of ocropus-0.2

2009-02-02 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Package: devscripts Severity: normal Version: 2.10.45 the title says it all ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org