Hi Michael,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503495
I don't think debian should make it harder than needed to enable encryption.
NNTPS is a way to do it, but putting protocols inside SSL on another port is
nowadays deprecated in favor of TLS upgrade through STARTTLS. We reall
Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> c) run nnrpd from inetd.
>
> This is not possible without the use of a secondary ip address.
Or running innd on port 433 and coordinating that with your peers and then
running nnrpd on port 119 out of xinetd or the like, which is really a
better soluti
Hi Michael,
I can surely send a patch.
Oh, in case there is a new version for Lenny, could you please update
at the same time the license:
http://inn.eyrie.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/branches/2.4/LICENSE
There is a new paragraph about lib/md5.c which is currently missing in what
is shipped wi
> > This can only be fixed by a.) compile nnrpd with SSL or b.) replace nnrpd
> > with a wrapper or alternatives.
> c) run nnrpd from inetd.
This is not possible without the use of a secondary ip address. As i already
said, innd listens on port 119 and will hand over readers to nnrpd. For most
use
On Oct 26, Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, upstream strongly believes that nnrpd should really be started
> > from inetd.
> I believe you are talking about NNTPS which is on a different port (563) on
> which inetd can listen and involke nnrpd/nnrpd-ssl with option -S. STARTTLS
>
> Also, upstream strongly believes that nnrpd should really be started
> from inetd.
I believe you are talking about NNTPS which is on a different port (563) on
which inetd can listen and involke nnrpd/nnrpd-ssl with option -S. STARTTLS
on the other hand "upgrades" an unencrypted reader connection
On Oct 26, Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can surely send a patch. But to be able to do this, i need a decision from
> you how you want to have the STARTTLS issue fixed. I don't know why you are
> currently building a nnrpd binary without SSL support and a nnrpd-ssl binary
> with
> Send a patch. I have no time to work on this, or even to determine how
> much of your report is correct.
I can surely send a patch. But to be able to do this, i need a decision from
you how you want to have the STARTTLS issue fixed. I don't know why you are
currently building a nnrpd binary wi
Send a patch. I have no time to work on this, or even to determine how
much of your report is correct.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: inn2
Version: 2.4.5-2
Severity: normal
README.Debian.gz contains some information regarding SSL support but it
turns out that whats written there is simply wrong, also the SSL support
in the package is completely broken anyway.
1. It is told that one needs a CA cert in /etc/news/nnrpd-c
10 matches
Mail list logo
