> Send a patch. I have no time to work on this, or even to determine how > much of your report is correct.
I can surely send a patch. But to be able to do this, i need a decision from you how you want to have the STARTTLS issue fixed. I don't know why you are currently building a nnrpd binary without SSL support and a nnrpd-ssl binary with SSL support. Therefore i can't decide because there might be a good reason. The simple solution would be to stop doing that and build the standard nnrpd binary with SSL support. Another solution would be to use either update- alternatives or a wrapper script combined with a debconf question for nnrpd which will either invoke a nnrpd-nossl or a nnrpd-ssl binary. I have another question however: If you don't care for your package, why don't you try to find another DD which will actually maintain it? As a DD myself i feel that handling bug reports in such a way is no good for the project. Regards Michael -- It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part of it. -- Bill Hicks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
