On Oct 26, Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can surely send a patch. But to be able to do this, i need a decision from > you how you want to have the STARTTLS issue fixed. I don't know why you are > currently building a nnrpd binary without SSL support and a nnrpd-ssl binary > with SSL support. Therefore i can't decide because there might be a good > reason. Because SSL support is rarely used and I did not want to add the memory overhead to the common case. Also, upstream strongly believes that nnrpd should really be started from inetd.
> I have another question however: If you don't care for your package, why > don't > you try to find another DD which will actually maintain it? As a DD myself i I do care. Do you care enough to help? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
