Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Yeah, but in spirit. So it might actually make more sense code
> history wise to revert that commit and then adapt it to be version
> agnostic.
This is fine to me. As long as the version is not hardcoded as it was.
> Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make sense, but I still
> wonder what Russ was looking at when he claimed in 476417 "The packages
> that depend on OCaml aren't using the versioned virtual packages now,".
I tried to do a search at th
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote (in #495431):
> > Hmm, isn't that like a reversal of d1a22f3e1a9503f401e517dcf38ebe44c3d4cce3
> > ?
> > [...]
>
> Not exactly...
Yeah, but in spirit. So it might actually make more sense code
history wise
3 matches
Mail list logo
