Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Yeah, but in spirit. So it might actually make more sense code > history wise to revert that commit and then adapt it to be version > agnostic.
This is fine to me. As long as the version is not hardcoded as it was. > Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make sense, but I > still wonder what Russ was looking at when he claimed in 476417 > "The packages that depend on OCaml aren't using the versioned > virtual packages now,". Maybe he was looking at source packages...? Besides, as I said, the ongoing OCaml transition must have added some fuzz in the mess. Cheers, -- Stéphane Glondu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
