On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote (in #495431): > > Hmm, isn't that like a reversal of d1a22f3e1a9503f401e517dcf38ebe44c3d4cce3 > > ? > > [...] > > Not exactly...
Yeah, but in spirit. So it might actually make more sense code history wise to revert that commit and then adapt it to be version agnostic. Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make sense, but I still wonder what Russ was looking at when he claimed in 476417 "The packages that depend on OCaml aren't using the versioned virtual packages now,". Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
