On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:55:29PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > We need a command that does what notfixed does.
> >
> > I'm not arguing that notfixed shouldn't do what it does now. I'm
> > arguing that it
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:55:29PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > We need a command that does what notfixed does.
>
> I'm not arguing that notfixed shouldn't do what it does now. I'm
> arguing that it should *also* mark the bug as open if it's currently
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:55:29PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > > I guess what he was trying to say, was that a versioned close + notfixed
> > > is
> > > the same as an unversion
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:51:10PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Yes, I know - I meant conceptually rather than in detail. notfixed
> > > should not leave the bug in a fixed/done-type state.
> > The proble
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:55:29PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:57:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:51:10PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes, I know - I meant conceptually rather than in detail. notfixed
> > should not leave the bug in a fixed/done-type state.
> The problem is that giving it side effects (reopening the bug)
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:42:21PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite
>> of -done.
> No, notfixed should be the opposite of fixed, which it is. reopen
> (or found) is the opposite of -done.
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> Yes, I know - I meant conceptually rather than in detail. notfixed
> should not leave the bug in a fixed/done-type state.
The problem is that giving it side effects (reopening the bug) means
that it's no longer associative.
That is,
fixed NNN VER1
notf
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:42:21PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite
> > of -done.
>
> No, notfixed should be the opposite of fixed, which it is. reopen (or
> found) is the opposite of -do
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:57:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite of
> > > -done. If what you say is the case t
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite
> of -done.
No, notfixed should be the opposite of fixed, which it is. reopen (or
found) is the opposite of -done. All notfixed does is removed a
version from the fixed list.
Its primar
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:57:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite of
> > -done. If what you say is the case then I think we (or indeed probably
> > I) buggere
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:15:16PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >> Bug #461617 is marked as "resolved" on
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wordpress;dist=unstable,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:47:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > 2) I can't find the message that marks it done without specifying a
> >version; could you please point me to it? Thanks.
> >
> >I see only two messages to -close, both with a
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:57:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>> By using notfixed you've effectively sent an unversioned -done.
> Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite of
> -done. If what you say is the case then I think we (or indeed probably
> I) buggered up the se
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:15:16PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Bug #461617 is marked as "resolved" on
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wordpress;dist=unstable,
>> but it is not solved in _any_ version, it was only
Package: bugs.debian.org
Bug #461617 is marked as "resolved" on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wordpress;dist=unstable,
but it is not solved in _any_ version, it was only transiently marked
so, but that was cancelled with "notfixed" and "found" commands. The
version graph on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
