On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:57:25PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Blink. Is that a typo? notfixed should be, if anything, the opposite of > > > -done. If what you say is the case then I think we (or indeed probably > > > I) buggered up the semantics rather badly. > > > > I guess what he was trying to say, was that a versioned close + notfixed is > > the same as an unversioned close. (notfixed removes the version, but does > > not > > change the status of the bug.) > > Ah. For the record I am inclined to think that is at best unintuitive > and probably a bug.
We need a command that does what notfixed does. I don't particularly care what we call it, but notfixed is the most symmetric thing that I could come up with, and it's in a namespace that wasn't already being used by any of the other commands. If we decide to rename it to something more clear, then notfound also needs to be renamed as well. Personally, unless there's some stunningly obvious name that I've missed, I'd rather just keep it the way it is. Don Armstrong -- PowerPoint is symptomatic of a certain type of bureaucratic environment: one typified by interminable presentations with lots of fussy little bullet-points and flashy dissolves and soundtracks masked into the background, to try to convince the audience that the goon behind the computer has something significant to say. -- Charles Stross _The Jennifer Morgue_ p33 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
