On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:30:47AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:00:03AM +0100, Emilian Nowak wrote:
> > On 15-02-2008, at 00:00:52 Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> >
> > > Gtk 1.x will be removed. It's a release goal for lenny. That's why all
> > > packages depending on it ha
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:07:00AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > as for rendering vs typing...yes, you're probably right. but it still
> > looks and "feels" like delays while typing because there's a noticable
> > delay between typing a letter and having it appear on screen.
>
> I don't reall
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:00:03AM +0100, Emilian Nowak wrote:
> On 15-02-2008, at 00:00:52 Mohammed Sameer wrote:
>
> > Gtk 1.x will be removed. It's a release goal for lenny. That's why all
> > packages depending on it has to be upgraded to gtk 2.x or removed.
> >
> > For m-g-t, It's been alrea
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:22:58AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > [snips]
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:06:25AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately, MGT is dead upstream and is scheduled for removal from
> > > > Debi
On 15-02-2008, at 00:00:52 Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> Gtk 1.x will be removed. It's a release goal for lenny. That's why all
> packages depending on it has to be upgraded to gtk 2.x or removed.
>
> For m-g-t, It's been already removed. I don't mind trying to port it but
> I can't do it alone. I'll
On 15-02-2008, at 08:06:25 Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Unfortunately, MGT is dead upstream and is scheduled for removal from
> > Debian.
>
> that would be a shame. gnome terminal (GT) just isn't as good as
> multi-gnome-terminal (MGT).
>
> - it's noticably slower than MGT, noticable even in delay
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> [snips]
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:06:25AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, MGT is dead upstream and is scheduled for removal from
> > > Debian.
> >
> > that would be a shame. gnome terminal (GT) just isn't as go
[snips]
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:06:25AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Unfortunately, MGT is dead upstream and is scheduled for removal from
> > Debian.
>
> that would be a shame. gnome terminal (GT) just isn't as good as
> multi-gnome-terminal (MGT).
>
> - it's noticably slower than MGT, n
> Unfortunately, MGT is dead upstream and is scheduled for removal from
> Debian.
that would be a shame. gnome terminal (GT) just isn't as good as
multi-gnome-terminal (MGT).
- it's noticably slower than MGT, noticable even in delays when
you are typing.
- GT's handling of tabs isn't as go
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:04:51PM +0100, Michal Politowski wrote:
> Package: multi-gnome-terminal
> Version: 1.6.2-13.1
> Severity: important
>
> With xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.1~git20080105-2 and 2:1.4.1~git20080118-1
> multi-gnome-terminal crashes after a right click on the terminal area
> (right
Package: multi-gnome-terminal
Version: 1.6.2-13.1
Severity: important
With xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.1~git20080105-2 and 2:1.4.1~git20080118-1
multi-gnome-terminal crashes after a right click on the terminal area
(right-clicking on the tabs works) with this error message:
Gdk-ERROR **: BadAlloc (ins
11 matches
Mail list logo
