On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > Odd, I thought pseudopackages still came from ftpmaster?
>
> b.d.o gets all the bugs, and owner@ has the actual power to create
> them.
Ah; I understand what you're getting at now. Yes, the pseudopackages
curr
tag 408150 wontfix
thanks
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:08:50 -0800
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's been a week; since most of the responses seem to be positive (or
> > of the "until we find a better solution" variety) I'll create this
> >
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:08:50 -0800
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been a week; since most of the responses seem to be positive (or
> of the "until we find a better solution" variety) I'll create this
> pseudo package tomorrow (mid-day PDT) unless there are any last minute
> object
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > "Gustavo Franco" writes...
> > > I would like to ask BTS admins to add a debian-admin (or equivalent)
> > > pseudo-package with their approval with the maintainer being
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discour
On 10909 March 1977, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Same as matt, Im local admin of debian.org machines and I am in favor of
>> this.
> I think this, or at least a dedicated request tracker for debian-admin, is
> an eminently sensible idea.
> Perhaps rt would be better, since the problem with the bug trac
On 1/24/07, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Philip Hands wrote:
> I think this, or at least a dedicated request tracker for debian-admin, is
> an eminently sensible idea.
>
> Perhaps rt would be better, since the problem with the bug tracking system
> being
Hello,
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Philip Hands wrote:
> I think this, or at least a dedicated request tracker for debian-admin, is
> an eminently sensible idea.
>
> Perhaps rt would be better, since the problem with the bug tracking system
> being open to all is that we're going to have to split the se
On 1/24/07, Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10908 March 1977, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
the list and ask for bugs reports instead. Same deal as in tech-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10908 March 1977, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
the list and ask for bugs reports instead. Same deal as in tech-ctte.
Thoughts?
>>> As someone who is subscribed
On 10908 March 1977, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
>> > the list and ask for bugs reports instead. Same deal as in tech-ctte.
>> > Thoughts?
>> As someone who is subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I'm a
>> local-admin of debian.org machine
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Matt Taggart wrote:
> "Gustavo Franco" writes...
> > I would like to ask BTS admins to add a debian-admin (or equivalent)
> > pseudo-package with their approval with the maintainer being
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
> > the list and ask for bugs
On 1/23/07, Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gustavo Franco" writes...
> I would like to ask BTS admins to add a debian-admin (or equivalent)
> pseudo-package with their approval with the maintainer being
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
> the list and ask for
"Gustavo Franco" writes...
> I would like to ask BTS admins to add a debian-admin (or equivalent)
> pseudo-package with their approval with the maintainer being
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
> the list and ask for bugs reports instead. Same deal as in tech-ctte.
> Tho
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I would like to ask BTS admins to add a debian-admin (or equivalent)
pseudo-package with their approval with the maintainer being
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We should discourage direct reports to
the list and ask for bugs reports instead. Same deal as in te
14 matches
Mail list logo
