On 10909 March 1977, Philip Hands wrote: >> Same as matt, Im local admin of debian.org machines and I am in favor of >> this. > I think this, or at least a dedicated request tracker for debian-admin, is > an eminently sensible idea. > Perhaps rt would be better, since the problem with the bug tracking system > being open to all is that we're going to have to split the security > sensitive stuff out so that it's only sent to the mailing-list, and then > finding all the information for an issue later is going to be a bit of a > pain when some of it is missing from the bug report.
Well. If you limit the BTS to "non-security relevant items" then its fine as a general pool for issues that are there, for example package install requests. Request Tracker would have the benefit of being able to host all issues, as you can do a lot with its ACL system. As I run a Request Tracker for DebConf already I volunteer to provide one for Debian, if there is consensus that we want RT instead of the BTS. Its not that hard to setup. -- bye Joerg Von einem Besucher auf dem LT: Die 3 Microsoft-Leute auf Ihrem Stand müssen sich vorkommen wie 3 Mönche im Puff.
pgpb1nxJ0uisJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
