Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > Conflict is already there, replace is not necessary since the files are
>> > installed into different trees (texmf-texlive and texmf).
>> >
>> > Closing this bug.
>>
>> Not sure that this is correct. If w
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 16.30:10 Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > A provide could be handy, but replace is useless, because no files are
> > replaced. But I don't have the policy at hand ...
>
> apt-cache rdepend latex-svninfo
>
> does not show anyth
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
> A provide could be handy, but replace is useless, because no files are
> replaced. But I don't have the policy at hand ...
apt-cache rdepend latex-svninfo
does not show anything, so not even provide should be necessary.
Anyone agrees?
Best wishes
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Conflict is already there, replace is not necessary since the files are
> > installed into different trees (texmf-texlive and texmf).
> >
> > Closing this bug.
>
> Not sure that this is correct. If we want to take it over, and make
> sure that users of
retitle 390032 Please conflict & replace latex-svninfo
assign 390032 texlive-latex-extra
thanks
On Friday 04 May 2007 18:05, you wrote:
> Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seriously, a dummy package for a package that provided one single file
> > only anyway is a bit silly... Can't
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously, a dummy package for a package that provided one single file only
> anyway is a bit silly... Can't texlive-latex-extra conflict/replace
> latex-svninfo?
Yes, we should do that. Of course you're free to keep maintaining it,
and we would
On Thursday 03 May 2007 19.14:56 Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> svninfo.sty is now provided by package texlive-latex-extra
> as /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/svninfo/svninfo.sty.
>
> I see 2 possible outcomes:
>
> - ask FTP admins to remove this package
Since tetex is now officially dead l
Hi,
svninfo.sty is now provided by package texlive-latex-extra
as /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/svninfo/svninfo.sty.
I see 2 possible outcomes:
- ask FTP admins to remove this package
- transform this package into a dummy package that depends on
texlive-latex-extra.
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Okt 2006, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>> I'm not actively using latex-svninfo atm, I mainly packaged it because I
>> used it one time and happen to know Achim (upstream) a bit. So if you're
>> so inclined you may as well consider it in RFA-l
Hi Adrian, hi Frank!
On Mon, 02 Okt 2006, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> NMU(s) very welcome, EBUSY for at least two/three weeks ($WORK during the
> week, and away next weekends, too.)
I have prepared a NMU 0.4-1.1 which should fix the two bugs about
texlive and about moving the config file.
Till
Hi Norbert, Frank
On Friday 29 September 2006 00:02, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Could you please upload a package which depends on
> tetex-bin |
> I checked the svninfo.sty and there are the following packages
> mentioned:
> fancyheadings
> not in TeX live
> fancyh
Package: latex-svninfo
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Adrian!
Could you please upload a package which depends on
tetex-bin |
I checked the svninfo.sty and there are the following packages
mentioned:
fancyheadings
not in TeX live
fancyhdr
12 matches
Mail list logo
