Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seriously, a dummy package for a package that provided one single file only > anyway is a bit silly... Can't texlive-latex-extra conflict/replace > latex-svninfo?
Yes, we should do that. Of course you're free to keep maintaining it, and we would exclude it from the texlive package. But I don't think that makes sense in that case (it would if lots of special knowledge were needed to handle its bugs, or if it was developped very fast). > Anyway, I'm going to file for removal of latex-svninfo now. > > Should I close this bug (and all other bugs against latex-svninfo) or should > I reassign it as wishlist against tetex-latex-extra (retitling it > appropriately)? I don't see any open bugs except this one? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
