On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:32:46PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi,
>
> You are using two debconf notes which really look like a debconf abuse
> (from debconf-devel(7): "It should be used only for important notes that
> the user really should see, since d
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/07/2006):
> tags 377618 -patch
> tags 377618 wontfix
> severity 377618 wishlist
> stop and no thanks
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
>
> > No, the argument of the priority is not valid. The lowest the priority
> > is,
tags 377618 -patch
tags 377618 wontfix
severity 377618 wishlist
stop and no thanks
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> No, the argument of the priority is not valid. The lowest the priority
> is, the more experienced the user is expected to be. An experienced user
>
tag 377618 patch
thanks
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/07/2006):
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> > You are using two debconf notes which really look like a debconf abuse
> > (from debconf-devel(7): "It should be used only for important notes that
> > the user really shoul
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are using two debconf notes which really look like a debconf abuse
> (from debconf-devel(7): "It should be used only for important notes that
> the user really should see, since debconf will go to great pains to make
> sure the user sees it
5 matches
Mail list logo
