tags 377618 -patch tags 377618 wontfix severity 377618 wishlist stop and no thanks
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote: <snipp> > No, the argument of the priority is not valid. The lowest the priority > is, the more experienced the user is expected to be. An experienced user > usually knows where to find the relevant doc, and expects to find it at > the right place. > Moreover, as I said in my previous mail, you should use debconf to > _configure_ the package, not to tell the user he/she can configure it. > I therefore attach a patch to configure with debconf the two related > items. Please check it carefully as I made it quickly. big NACK, this is a real policy violation, one is not allowed to change configfiles with debconf. you would need to put it into /etc/defaults/logcheck. and as you currently failed to convince me politely, downgrading this "bug". this debconf messages were added way before the logcheck team formed and we cleaned them up already a lot. the second note will soon be phase out. > See also policy 3.9.1: > > Packages should try to minimize the amount of prompting they need to do > > You seem to use debconf only because it is "more effective" please notice the subtle _should_ -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
