On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 00:24:20 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 01:49 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:42:21 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > > And we need 2.11, to distinguish 8,7,9,10,11,12 releases.
> > > But I guess, presented dpkg-architecture.pl patch s
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 01:49 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:42:21 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 05:15 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-solaris
> > > i386-pc-solaris2
> >
> > And we need 2.1
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:42:21 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 05:15 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-solaris
> > i386-pc-solaris2
>
> And we need 2.11, to distinguish 8,7,9,10,11,12 releases.
> But I guess, presented dpkg
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 05:15 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:13:47PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 00:52 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > to match "debian" part of ostable (see below), i.e. pc-solaris2
>
> Then this should not be really needed (see be
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:16:43PM -0700, Nexenta Systems, Inc. wrote:
> One of the issues we originally encountered is the artifact
> associated with SunOS 5.x (Solaris) ports of many OSS packages,
> in that they follow the following scheme:
>
> {i386,sparc}-{sun,pc}-solaris2.xx
This is t
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:13:47PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 00:52 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> to match "debian" part of ostable (see below), i.e. pc-solaris2
Then this should not be really needed (see below).
> Indeed, I forget to add ostable snippet. Here it goes:
N
Guillem Jover wrote:
Resulted printouts should be:
$ dpkg-architecture
[...]
DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i486
Why is this different than the one on GNU_TYPE?
DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=solaris
This should match the GNU_TYPE as well, so solaris2.11.
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i386-pc-solaris2.11
The -pc-
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 00:52 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some additional comments:
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:03:44PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 01:59 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > >
Hi,
Some additional comments:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:03:44PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 01:59 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > > Index: scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl
> > > =
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 01:59 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > --- debian/control (.../pool/current) (revision 20420)
> > +++ debian/control (.../trunk) (revision 20420)
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> > Origin: debian
> > Bugs: de
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> --- debian/control(.../pool/current) (revision 20420)
> +++ debian/control(.../trunk) (revision 20420)
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> Origin: debian
> Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org
> Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
> -Build-Depen
tags 361866 +patch
Patch is against dpkg 1.13.11.
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (.../pool/current) (revision 20420)
+++ debian/control (.../trunk) (revision 20420)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Origin: debian
Bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
