On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 05:15 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:13:47PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 00:52 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > > to match "debian" part of ostable (see below), i.e. pc-solaris2 > > Then this should not be really needed (see below). > > > Indeed, I forget to add ostable snippet. Here it goes: > > No problem. > > > Index: ostable > > =================================================================== > > --- ostable (.../pool/current) (revision 20425) > > +++ ostable (.../trunk) (revision 20425) > > @@ -21,3 +21,4 @@ > > netbsd netbsd netbsd[^-]* > > openbsd openbsd openbsd[^-]* > > hurd gnu gnu[^-]* > > +solaris pc-solaris2 solaris.* > > This one should be probably: > > solaris solaris solaris[^-]* > > When combining with the cpu and normalized it should give: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-solaris > i386-pc-solaris2
And we need 2.11, to distinguish 8,7,9,10,11,12 releases. But I guess, presented dpkg-architecture.pl patch should take care.. So, yes this might work, but not always (see below) > > > > Resulted printouts should be: > > > > > > > $ dpkg-architecture > > > [...] > > > > DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i486 > > > > > > Why is this different than the one on GNU_TYPE? > > > > AFAIK, GNU_TYPE != GNU_CPU. > > I meant in the way that GNU_CPU + GNU_SYSTEM == GNU_TYPE. > > > > > DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=solaris > > > > > > This should match the GNU_TYPE as well, so solaris2.11. > > > > > > > DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i386-pc-solaris2.11 > > > > > > The -pc- part should not be here. > > > > Impossible. --build and --host parameters will be screwed all over. > > which will lead to erroneous platform detection in autoconf scripts. > > config.sub takes care of normalizing: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-solaris2.11 > i386-pc-solaris2.11 > > The same happens on a GNU/Linux system, when you feed the output from > "gcc -dumpmachine" to config.sub it gets normalized, and that's what > we are using in ostable: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -dumpmachine > i486-linux-gnu > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i486-linux-gnu > i486-pc-linux-gnu The problem is that on sparc this normalization is broken: -bash-3.00# uname -a SunOS dot92 5.11 snv_31 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 -bash-3.00# ./config.sub sparc-solaris2.11 sparc-unknown-solaris2.11 but we expect: sparc-sun-solaris2.11 as Mac outlined in previous e-mail. But if your concern is mostly about "cleanness" of ostable, I think we can patch dpkg-architecture.pl some more instead. And since it is already patched, than I assume it will be cleaner, indeed. -- Erast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
