Hi, On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:42:21 -0700, Erast Benson wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 05:15 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-solaris > > i386-pc-solaris2 > > And we need 2.11, to distinguish 8,7,9,10,11,12 releases. > But I guess, presented dpkg-architecture.pl patch should take care.. > So, yes this might work, but not always (see below)
Why do you need the 2.11, would another release imply a new Debian architecture, are the kernels incompatible, the libc etc? And I don't see anything relevant below. > The problem is that on sparc this normalization is broken: > > -bash-3.00# uname -a > SunOS dot92 5.11 snv_31 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 > -bash-3.00# ./config.sub sparc-solaris2.11 > sparc-unknown-solaris2.11 > > but we expect: > > sparc-sun-solaris2.11 > > as Mac outlined in previous e-mail. Well if config.guess is producing unwanted output, you should be fixing it instead of working it around in all other programs. > But if your concern is mostly about "cleanness" of ostable, I think we > can patch dpkg-architecture.pl some more instead. And since it is > already patched, than I assume it will be cleaner, indeed. The idea is to reduce the special casing in dpkg-architecture not to add any more to it. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
