I asked:
why was x-dev dependency added to the `Build-Depends:' field ? As
`libxt-dev` already depends on it (via e.g. libx11-dev), I don't think
it should be marked twice. Am I missing something ?
and Steve replied:
You use headers from x-dev directly; you shouldn't rely on transitive
depende
Thomas Girard wrote:
> In the meantime, the bug was fixed in our repo [1] but no new package
> was built. Never mind, my fault, I should have replied the bug report
> when it was sent.
Good, forget about the ITNMU then!
> So I don't oppose the NMU :-) But I have a question anyway: why was
> x-dev
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:22:10AM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Hello Amaya,
> >tags 346607 pending patch
> >I intend to NMU ace to the 5day queue, if you don't oppose.
> >Patches provided by Victor Seva are attached.
> I do apologize for the late reply. Somehow your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hello Amaya,
tags 346607 pending patch
I intend to NMU ace to the 5day queue, if you don't oppose.
Patches provided by Victor Seva are attached.
I do apologize for the late reply. Somehow your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
didn't get forwarded to this mailing list, and thus I did not read it
until
4 matches
Mail list logo
