On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:22:10AM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: > Hello Amaya,
> >tags 346607 pending patch > >I intend to NMU ace to the 5day queue, if you don't oppose. > >Patches provided by Victor Seva are attached. > I do apologize for the late reply. Somehow your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > didn't get forwarded to this mailing list, and thus I did not read it > until now :-( > In the meantime, the bug was fixed in our repo [1] but no new package > was built. Never mind, my fault, I should have replied the bug report > when it was sent. > So I don't oppose the NMU :-) But I have a question anyway: why was > x-dev dependency added to the `Build-Depends:' field ? As `libxt-dev` > already depends on it (via e.g. libx11-dev), I don't think it should be > marked twice. Am I missing something ? You use headers from x-dev directly; you shouldn't rely on transitive dependencies to pull it in, as those are subject to change. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
