Thomas Girard wrote: > In the meantime, the bug was fixed in our repo [1] but no new package > was built. Never mind, my fault, I should have replied the bug report > when it was sent.
Good, forget about the ITNMU then! > So I don't oppose the NMU :-) But I have a question anyway: why was > x-dev dependency added to the `Build-Depends:' field ? As `libxt-dev` > already depends on it (via e.g. libx11-dev), I don't think it should > be marked twice. Am I missing something ? I thin Víctor will be able to elaborate more on that. I have noty looked carefully at the patch, I am just the sponsor, and at a first glance it looked fine. Thanks for noticing this. Thanks again! -- .''`. Männer sind Schweine (All men are pigs) -- Die Ärzte : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
