Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:29:15 +0100 Baruch Even wrote:
>
>>The *only* option is to remove the documentation so etch will be
>>documentation-less unless the GFDL will be changed to be DFSG free.
>
>
> Or find replacement DFSG-free documentation (possibly write or help
> wri
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:29:15 +0100 Baruch Even wrote:
[...]
> Discussion with the author showed there is no chance to change the
> license since it's a GNU package with policy being mandated by the
> FSF.
I know.
>
> The *only* option is to remove the documentation so etch will be
> documentati
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:07:54 +0100 Baruch Even wrote:
>
>
>>Francesco Poli wrote:
>>
>>>I think that the severity of this bug is not properly set.
>>>Being a severe violation of Debian policy, it should be raised to
>>>severity 'serious', I would say.
>>
>>I agree that by
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:07:54 +0100 Baruch Even wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I think that the severity of this bug is not properly set.
> > Being a severe violation of Debian policy, it should be raised to
> > severity 'serious', I would say.
>
> I agree that by normal standards this bug sho
Francesco Poli wrote:
> I think that the severity of this bug is not properly set.
> Being a severe violation of Debian policy, it should be raised to
> severity 'serious', I would say.
I agree that by normal standards this bug should be considered serious.
But I do not want to stop the version fr
Hi!
I think that the severity of this bug is not properly set.
Being a severe violation of Debian policy, it should be raised to
severity 'serious', I would say.
Thanks.
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
...
6 matches
Mail list logo
