Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:29:15 +0100 Baruch Even wrote: > >>The *only* option is to remove the documentation so etch will be >>documentation-less unless the GFDL will be changed to be DFSG free. > > > Or find replacement DFSG-free documentation (possibly write or help > writing such documentation)...
I'd be happy if you (or someone else) would volunteer to do it, but I don't have the time to do it. It is a shame that it gets to it, but I have better things to do than rewriting documentation. > One question: since the bug was already there long ago (only buried > under a botched copyright notice), can you send a "found in version > very.first.that.hit.the.archives" to the BTS? > Would this allow new versions to propagate to testing (the RC bug is > *already* in testing, so the RC bug count will not increase with a new > version entering testing)? Maybe it would work, I have no idea, and don't think it's important enough an issue to lookup. Once you verify that this indeed will work as intended, feel free to change the severity and the version. I do not think it is important for me to do as the bug is properly marked with the appropriate usertags as requested by the RM. Baruch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
