On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I would want to know
> > your thoughts on this.
>
> I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I would want to know
> > your thoughts on this.
>
> I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> I would want to know
> your thoughts on this.
I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong.
I certainly wouldn't want to patch the generated *.la files, so I was
search
Hi,
I wonder why this trivial two year old bug is not fixed
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297741
And without comment in the BTS.
This will break any package that tries to use libtool to statically
link glib-2.0.
I'm planning to upload one, but now I have to kludge around it
4 matches
Mail list logo
