On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100 Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I would want to know
> > your thoughts on this.
>
> I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong.
> I certainly wouldn't want to patch the generated *.la files, so I was
> searching for an issue in the build process, and since there was
> nothing fancy in either case, I gave up.
>
> Now, I think this is finally fixed, but with glib 2.12.9 (in
> experimental); could you confirm this is the case?
No unfortunately it's not fixed in experimental, the .la file still has:
# The name of the static archive.
old_library=''
Which is incorrect. Maybe I'll have a look at it....
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
