Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:24:53AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 09:30 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > The split in the transaction on the asset account is presented as a > > debit. If only one account is mentioned I always assume it is a split. > I don't know what you m

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 09:30 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 04:19:21PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > Moving money from an asset account to some other account is a credit on > > the asset account and a debit on the other account. So I don't know > > what you mean sayin

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 04:19:21PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Moving money from an asset account to some other account is a credit on > the asset account and a debit on the other account. So I don't know > what you mean saying that "it" is presented as a credit; what is? The > transacti

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 00:00 +, Mark Brown wrote: > One of the things I'm doing that produces a result I don't expect is > that the amount removed from an asset account is being presented as a > "credit" so I don't think that's what's going on here, at least not > entirely. See, this is where t

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 03:29:18PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 21:50 +, Mark Brown wrote: > Accounts>Labels>Use formal accounting labels > > does not affect the General Ledger, nor is it clear at all how it could > be. It does with 2.0.2-2.1 currently in unstabl

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 21:50 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:49:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > What would you like done in the surrounding dialog? Perhaps there is a > > wishlist item here, if you think something could be made more clear. > > Looking at the sch

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:49:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > What would you like done in the surrounding dialog? Perhaps there is a > wishlist item here, if you think something could be made more clear. Looking at the scheduled transaction editor in conjunction with the preference "Acc

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 11:29 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:18:04PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 22:54 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > > > These are the standard terms used for these columns in a general ledger, > > > which is the register vi

Bug#218603: closed by Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid)

2007-01-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:18:04PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 22:54 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > These are the standard terms used for these columns in a general ledger, > > which is the register view used for the template transaction editing. > > - http://bu

Bug#218603: resolution upstream: invalid

2007-01-13 Thread Josh Sled
These are the standard terms used for these columns in a general ledger, which is the register view used for the template transaction editing. - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339002 -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org;echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.